Skip to main content

The ten systems

Ten centralized admission systems

The study combines administrative records from ten centralized admission systems. The profiles document allocation rules, application timing, institutional coverage, performance measures, sample construction, sex-differentiated rules, and data provenance.

At a glance

The comparison is based on the institutional tables and setting-specific notes in Appendix A. Cells marked pending · value have not been transcribed from the source material.

Comparison of the ten centralized admission systems
AustraliaATAR, a percentile rank built from scaled subject scoresYes — lists are finalized after the ATAR is released in December12 programsClearinghouse (DA family); offer rounds from JanuaryNone documented2009–20107,748
BrazilENEM score, weighted by programYes — ENEM results are released before the SISU window opens2 programsIterative deferred acceptance; provisional cutoffs updated dailyNone documented2016271,049
ChileHigh school GPA and PSU sections, weighted by programYes — PSU scores are released before lists are submitted10 programsDeferred acceptanceNone documented2012–2018174,020
ChinaGaokao total, within province and trackYes; lists are submitted after scores, quotas, and fees are published24 college-major cellsParallel-choice DA within each batchNone documented20185,203
FinlandMatriculation grades and/or entrance examPartly; most applicants already hold a completed certificate, but the entrance exam comes after lists close6 programsDeferred acceptance over admission queuesNone documented2016-202034,585
GreecePanhellenic Examinations (PE) scoreYes — ranked lists are submitted after PE results are releasedNo numerical limit, within at most 2 of 5 subject categoriesScore-ordered allocation along declared preferences (deferred acceptance)None documented2003–201268,007
SpainBachillerato GPA (60%) + EBAU (40%), weighted by programYes; students know their exam results when the ranked list is submitted12 programsScore-ordered regional assignment (deferred acceptance)None documented2020-202485,691
SwedenUpper-secondary GPA and/or Hogskoleprovet (scholastic aptitude test)No; the list closes before results are released20 programsDeferred acceptance in two roundsNone documented2008-2017 (analysis: 2017)10,758
TaiwanAST subject scores, weighted by programYes; lists are submitted after exam scores are released100 programsProgram-proposing deferred acceptanceNone documented2002–2010; analysis uses 20106,998
UgandaOfficial PUJAB weighted score; paper ranks on its own raw-grade indexNo; applications precede national-examination results6 programsMerit-order selection+1.5 points for women since 1990; 40:60 STEM ratio at Makerere; 30:70 at four others2021–20223,187

What holds across all ten

  • All ten systems rank students on academic performance and assign places through variants of deferred acceptance.
  • Deferred acceptance gives applicants little incentive to misreport, so the submitted list is informative about the ordering of programs they were willing to enter.
  • List-length caps range from two programs in Brazil to a hundred in Taiwan, and Greece imposes no numerical limit at all.

System pages